Time: 3.20 Minutes

The best entrepreneurial bets are asymmetric: you risk almost nothing, for a few weeks, small money, mild embarrassment, but the upside is uncapped.

That’s a good lottery ticket. Tiny downside, huge potential, and fast signal on whether it works.

Most founders you admire didn’t strike gold first try. They cycled through dozens of ideas before one compounded.

The genius wasn’t the idea, it was the volume. Each ticket taught them what customers actually pay for versus what merely sounds clever in a notebook.

The mistake is treating every idea like a marriage. It’s not. It’s a ticket. Buy it cheap, test it fast, read the signal honestly. No real traction in ninety days?

No sunk-cost guilt, move on to the next one.

Collect tickets relentlessly. Ship faster than feels comfortable. The winner is rarely idea one, it’s usually seven, eight, or even twelve.

So get more shots on goal and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

In general there are two types of people in work life…

Explorers and executers. To get something done, you need both.

But can you be both or is focus needed. Lets find out.

First things first.

Explorers experiment, fail fast, question assumptions, chase new.

Executors standardize, automate, leverage what works, fail never.

They work on the same company, but in a completely different operating system. So what is better or when you need what?

So before product-market fit you need pure exploration. What problem are we solving? Who actually buys? What makes them want it?

This is defently the wrong time to optimize, but the right time to question everything.

Execution here, would kill every company by scaling broken assumptions.

After fit, exploration becomes expensive chaos. Now you standardize, automate, extract value from what’s proven.

Wrong time to reinvent, but right time to compound.

So there are some people can genuinely do both, but of course not simultaneously. Their skill isn’t being both explorer and executor, it’s knowing exactly when to switch.

So stop experimenting when something works. And stop scaling when the market shifts. That timing separates good entrepreneurs from great ones.

But in the end most people can’t switch cleanly. They’re wired for one mode and that’s not a weakness. Forcing an executor to explore produces paralysis. Forcing an explorer to standardize produces ends often in chaos.

So the solution isn’t fighting your nature. It’s finding your complement. The best founding teams are one explorer, one executor, and operating in the right mode at the right moment.

So find the timing to switch and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 2.50 Minutes

This is maybe a unobvoius truth, but most blank canvas businesses fail quietly more often then you think.

Infinite possibility sounds liberating for the start, but they are a trap.

If you looking for a new business idea, you realize no borders are most of the time pushing you away finding a great solution for a real problem.

Greenfields are seductive. No legacy, no limitations, pure vision.

But it’s also where most startups evaporate, building solutions searching for problems. (the worst way you can choose to execute an idea)

There is one better move…

Find the trenches. Regulated industries, legacy software, frustrated workflows, underserved niches.

Places where constraints create friction. Because friction creates willingness to pay.

Constraints tell you exactly what matters.

Budget limits reveal true priorities. Compliance requirements expose where risk lives. Legacy systems show where pain concentrates.

If you can generate real value inside those constraints, navigating the complexity others avoid, you’ve found something defensible.

Because the constraints that slow competitors down become your moat.

Opportunity hides where it’s uncomfortable. Go there.

So find the constrains first and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.20 Minutes

At its core, capitalism is just elegant…

Create more value than you consume, such that both parties leave the transaction better off.

That’s it. That’s the whole game.

Zero-sum thinking says one winner requires one loser. Like poker.

Negotiating a used car. Fixed pie, redistributed slices. Most people mistake business for this.

Positive-sum games create new value entirely. You pay twenty dollars for a book that generates a hundred thousand in knowledge.

Like the author earns, but you even earn more.

The pie gets bigger.

Great businesses are positive-sum machines. Every transaction should leave customers richer, in time, money, capability, or peace of mind, than before they met you.

So the recipe is simple…

Obsessively understand what your customer actually values, then deliver more of it than you charge for.

Price below the value you create. Then repeat at scale.

That it.

(I know this sounds so easy, but is hard to achieve)

But then customers win visibly, they return to you, they refer you, and they trust you also with new stuff.

That compounding loyalty is what capitalism actually rewards when played out correctly. And is often the why longterm thinkers are get great rewards over time.

So look out for the win-win and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Why Results Matter More Than Ever

AI democratized capability, not success.

Everyone has the same tools now, the gap is between people who just generate and people who ship solutions to actual problems.

Building valuable stuff that solves real problems remains the only game. Even more now.

AI just accelerates execution. The winners aren’t prompt engineers; they’re builders using AI relentlessly to create things the market actually pays for.

Real economic value distills to four outcomes:

1. saving time

2. saving money

3. making more money

4. reducing risk

Every business that survives, touches at least one. If your AI project doesn’t map to these, you’re experimenting, not building.

The leverage isn’t in better outputs, it’s in faster problem-solving.

Use AI to cut procurement waste, automate functioning customer support, launch products customers want…

But don’t outsource the thinking of how to build real value for your customers and users.

The economy rewards people who solve problems, not people who talk beautifully about solving them.

AI is the tool. Results are still the scoreboard.

So build on value and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.10 Minutes

Hiring is maybe the most controversial topic of all…

And even with the best methods you will hire more often wrong then right. But maybe there is a better way to score at least not too bad.

So most interviews test credentials and culture fit. But smart companies test idea density instead.

When a candidate drops insights you immediately want to implement, you’ve found maybe THE signal cutting through the résumé noise.

So the feeling you looking for to have yourself after you interviewed a canidate is…

“I want to implement half their ideas even if we don’t hire them”.

This isn’t just a feeling, it’s your company recognizing natural alignment.

They’re already solving your problems without access to internal systems. Imagine what they’d do with actual context.

This flips the a hiring script. Stop asking hypotheticals about workplace conflicts.

Start asking: “What would you change about our product?”

The ones who’ve already thought about it, who have frameworks ready, who make you reach for your notes, those are your people.

Bad hires have good answers to your questions. Great hires have better questions than you knew to ask.

They’re not performing competence; they’re leaking expertise they can’t help but share.

So hire the idea leakers and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 1.10 Minutes

Today a short one for you…

Growth is inevitable for business, so getting great advice from the best of the best which did it before is pure gold.

One who invested in that topic a lot of great work is Elad Gil. And now the best thing you can read his Handbook about High Growth for free here:

High Growth Handbook by Elad Gil

So read on and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Remember when you first joined any social media app and found five of your friends in the first few minutes?

That wasn’t an accident. That was your aha moment. The exact point where you went from “trying this out” to “I need this.”

Everything before that moment is friction. Everything after is retention.

Most products never get users there. They bury value behind tutorials, feature tours, and empty states. Users leave before experiencing why your product matters.

The distance between signup and aha moment predicts churn better than almost anything else.

Slack knew this, their aha moment was 2,000 messages sent by a team. They optimized everything to get teams there fast.

Find your aha moment by looking at users who stick around. What did they do in the first session that churned users didn’t?

That’s the signal to follow.

Then remove everything between signup and that moment.

No tours. No “complete your profile.” Get them to value immediately.

Users don’t churn because your product is bad. They churn because they never experienced it being good.

So get to aha fast and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.10 Minutes

You know churn is killing you. Now what?

Start by segmenting who’s leaving.

Not all churn is equal. Are you losing customers in month one or month twelve?

But why this is such a gig difference…

Early churn means your onboarding sucks or you’re selling to the wrong people. Late churn means your product stopped delivering value or competitors caught up.

Talk to the people who left. Best in an actual conversations. Ask what they expected versus what they got.

Most founders skip this because it’s uncomfortable. Do it anyway.

Then look at your best customers, the ones who stay and expand. What do they have in common?

That’s your actual ICP, not the one you made up in your pitch deck.

Double down there and stop selling to everyone else.

Fix your onboarding. Most SaaS churn happens because users never reached the “aha moment” where your product clicks.

Measure time-to-value and kill every friction point between signup and that moment.

The answer isn’t in your growth playbook. It’s in the reasons why some people leave and why your best customers stay.

Start there.

So listen to leaving customers and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.20 Minutes

Every asked yourself why everyone is so obsessed about churn metrics? No?

Let me give you an example…

You’re adding new customers every month. Revenue is climbing. You feel like you’re winning.

Then you check retention and realize you’re filling a leaky bucket…

Jason Cohen nailed this with his concept of max ARR, the ceiling your business can’t break through because churn eats everything you add.

Imagine, you’re losing 5% of revenue every month, there’s a mathematical limit to how big you can get. No amount of new sales will ever fixes this.

Here's the brutal math:

You're adding $100k in new ARR monthly but losing 5% to churn.

Your maximum ARR caps at $2M. Ever.

You can't get past it because at $2M, you lose $100k monthly to churn, exactly what you're adding.

The treadmill stops moving forward.

Churn isn’t a retention problem. It’s a product problem, a pricing problem, an onboarding problem, or a customer-fit problem.

Fix churn first. Because until you do, every dollar you spend on growth is just funding your leaky bucket.

So listen to your churn rate and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.10 Minutes

You finally hit product-market fit. Customers love your product. Retention is solid. People are telling their friends.

Youre ready to scale.

You dump money into ads and hire a sales team. You close deals but every one feels custom, unrepeatable, exhausting. What’s wrong?

You have product-market fit but not go-to-market fit.

They’re not the same thing.

Product-market fit is when customers start pulling your product toward them instead of you pushing it onto them. But validation doesn’t automatically become a scalable business.

Many enterprise startups get to PMF but don’t achieve growth and acceleration because there’s a missing link. That link is GTM fit.

But what does this mean?

Knowing exactly who buys, how they buy, what they pay, and most important how to build a repeatable machine around that motion.

Think of Go-to-market fit as a system that prints customers.

So go find that system and stay curious after you hit PMF.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Mark Roberge, HubSpot’s first CRO who scaled them from $0 to $100M, proved something most founders ignore:

You can have a great product and still fail because you picked the wrong go-to-market strategy.

Go-to-market fit means your sales and marketing approach actually matches your product and target customer. Sounds easy but it is hard to master.

Roberge built HubSpot’s entire sales machine around this, hiring the same profile, training the same way, measuring the same metrics, optimizing the same funnel.

Most startups mess this up.

They build enterprise software and try to sell it with self-serve PLG.

Or they build a $50/month tool and hire expensive enterprise sales reps.

The product might be perfect. But the GTM kills them...

So define your ideal customer profile ruthlessly. Then build a repeatable sales process around it. then hire and scale the people/process who fit that exact motion.

Don’t hire a sales team and hope they figure it out on their own…

They need a well oiled machine which is already running.

So build the machine, find your working channel and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.40 Minutes

Most startups don’t have a growth engine. They have a collection of tactics that work once and die.

A growth engine is different.

It’s a self-sustaining loop that compounds input and creates output. Then output funds more input, repeat forever.

Without this approach, you’re stuck doing manual outbound, chasing one-time viral hits, and hitting ceilings fast.

There are four main engines:

• SEO (create content → users find it → revenue funds more content)

• Paid Acquisition (spend on ads → acquire users → revenue funds more ads)

• Sales-Led (hire salespeople → close deals → revenue funds more salespeople)

• Product-Led/Viral (users get value → they invite others → more users create more value)

Pick one. Build it properly.

Most founders layer on “turbo boosts” like viral campaigns, PR hits, partnerships and think that’s growth.

But it’s not. Those are temporary spikes.

The engine is what creates compounding S-curves. Everything else just helps it run faster.

If you’re grinding manually every month to hit numbers, you don’t have an engine yet.

You have a treadmill disguised as a strategy.

So build the loop, optimize it and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Product-market fit isn’t forever.

You can have it, then lose it. You have to cherish it, maintain it and always watch it.

This isn’t debated, it’s consensus among all growth experts.

When PMF slips, everything breaks.

Your retention curves flatten. Organic growth stalls. Acquisition costs spike because you’re forcing people into something they don’t love anymore.

The growth engine that used to compound now just burns your cash.

Customer expectations can evolve. What delighted users yesterday becomes table stakes tomorrow.

You chase new markets and dilute your core value proposition. Competition catches up. You stop listening to the users who actually love your product and start building for everyone else.

So treat PMF like fitness…

You lose it without consistent effort. Therefore, taking score of your PMF and tracking retention cohorts, is key.

Focus ruthlessly on your core users, the ones with high expectations who actually care. No-one else.

PMF isn’t a milestone. It’s a system you have to maintain or your business will die.

So start watching your PMF score and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.40 Minutes

Product-market fit isn’t one priority among many. It’s the only priority that matters until you have it.

Here’s the reality: CB Insights data is brutal. 42% of startup failures come from no market need.

This is a product issue.

Only 14% fail because of poor marketing. Most founders think they have a growth problem when they actually have a product problem.

You can’t growth-hack your way out of weak retention. You can’t A/B test your way to product-market fit. You can’t spend your way past a product people don’t actually want.

Growth without strong PMF at its core, is nothing.

You’ll optimize channels, test landing pages, run ads and watch users sign up, whixh try once, and never come back.

The metrics will maybe look good, until you check retention.

Products are built to fit with channels. Channels do not mold to products. If your product doesn’t solve a real problem that people willingly pay for at its core, no growth strategy will save you. Ever.

Product-market fit isn’t a milestone you hit and move past. It’s the foundation everything else sits on.

Growth amplifies what’s already there. Without PMF, you’re just amplifying failure faster.

Fix the product first. Then its about to scale.

So always start with your core and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.50 Minutes

Andrew Chen said it recently on X:

Most founders don’t have a growth problem. They have a product problem disguised as a growth problem.

This really matters. Because you can’t growth-hack your way out of a bad product.

Products are built to fit with channels. Channels do not mold to products. If your product doesn’t solve a real problem, no amount of marketing will save you.

But the reverse is also true.

A common mistake is working on features when you should be getting the existing product to more people.

This is why “Head of Growth” roles are tricky.

You’re being asked to scale something that might not be ready to scale. So only take those roles where you have significant control over product, or if you’re just running up the score on something that proofed already been working.

Growth and product aren’t separate functions.

They’re the same conversation. Your product strategy should answer, how will users discover this?

Your growth strategy should answer, does this actually solve the problem we said it would?

When they’re disconnected, you build features nobody wants. So keep them connected. Always

So connect what has to be connected and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 1.40 Minutes

School taught you to finish and hand it in. Business rewards you for never being finished.

This is a rule you should live by…

Done is a moment. Better is a direction.

The companies and people winning right now aren’t shipping perfect products.

They’re shipping, learning, improving, and shipping again. Every day.

Most people stop when it’s good enough. That’s exactly why relentless improvement is a competitive advantage, because it’s uncomfortable and most people quit.

Choose better over done. Every time.

So be better and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.40 Minutes

Stripe just hit a $140 billion valuation. No IPO. No quarterly earnings calls. No Wall Street circus.

And they found a great way to be a public company without being public.

Since 2024, Stripe has run recurring tender offers as a standing liquidity program for employees and early investors. Co-founder John Collison says they’re still not in any rush to go public.

At $140 billion, the rush is hard to see for them.

This isn’t a waypoint to an IPO. It’s becoming a substitute for one.

The smartest move: they solved the only real reason companies go public in the first place → employee liquidity.

If Stripe can keep running tenders at rising valuations every six to nine months, it removes the single strongest argument for going public.

This lesson isn’t just about finance.

It’s about control. Going public means answering to everyone.

Staying private and engineering your own liquidity means you keep building the way you want.

Stripe chose the latter. And the market is rewarding them for it.

So think about who you want to answer and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 2.40 Minutes

Everyone talks about scaling to unicorn status on your own via AI lately…

But instead everyone should talk about building a business that runs without draining you completely “via” AI.

The real flex isn’t a billion dollar valuation. It’s working four hours and the business keeps moving. Tim’s Ferriss is maybe more back then ever…

One person can now run what used to require an entire team. AI handles customer support. Automation handles onboarding. Systems handle the repetitive decisions you used to make manually every day.

The goal isn’t unicorn status. It’s building something that works while you sleep, think, travel, or just live your life.

Start by listing everything you do weekly. Ask honestly: does this need me specifically, or just someone or something consistent?

Most tasks don’t need you. They need a system.

Build the system once. Let it run. Stay for the decisions only you can make.

That’s the real one-person unicorn.

So use AI right and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

You can’t always rely on others’ reach. So build your own attention while you grow.

Build with your community, not just for them.

Nothing Phone does this brilliantly, they use their community to test ideas, validate designs, and develop new products before launch.

Early supporters don’t just buy the phone, they help create it.

Share what you’re building in real-time. Revenue milestones, product decisions, failed experiments.

Do it everywhere people pay attention, social media, industry events, podcasts, case studies, forums, speaking gigs.

What actually works: “Considering two pricing models, which makes more sense?” “Just killed a feature we spent 3 months on, here’s why.” “Beta testers found this bug before launch, saved us $20k.”

Why this works: People love being part of the journey, not just watching it.

When they influence decisions, they become invested in your success. Your early community becomes your best product team and your loudest advocates.

As you grow, this gets harder.

Capitalize on being small. Let people shape what you’re building while you still can.

So use what you have and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.