Time: 2.40 Minutes

There’s a one-minute exercise to de-risking your life… And you certainly do this more often then not…

Imagine you wake up in a hospital, lose your job, or your partner leaves.

What’s the most likely reason? And what could you do today to prevent it?

Just some simple questions. What’s striking is the ratio of how important they are to how rarely you actually ask them yourself.

Every company should run its own version. Even Paul Graham built half of YC’s advice on exactly this idea.

Who’s your customer? Why aren’t they buying? What do they actually want?

Not clever questions, obvious ones, but most founders never sit down and answer them honestly.

There’s no magic system. Startups are just straight execution on simple questions asked relentlessly.

Ask the obvious ones more often. That’s the whole edge.

So question yourself more often and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Warren Buffett said it best…

A good business isn’t one that grows, it’s one that earns high returns on capital for a long time.

Growth is vanity (at least at some point).

Cashflow is survival.

At the start of any entrepreneurial journey, generating consistent cashflow should probably be your goal number one.

Not scale. Not vision.

This is may be surprising, but cash hitting your account, is in any way helpful. Why?

Because it’s ten times easier to build when you aren’t strapped.

When your companies lifestyle covered, you make calm decisions. Without it, you operate from fear and scarcity, and fear makes terrible bets.

And if you ever do want VC money, cashflow flips the power dynamic entirely.

Investors chase businesses that already work. Positive cashflow means you’re raising from strength, not desperation.

Better terms, higher valuation, and the freedom to say no. You’re negotiating as an equal, not a beggar.

Be honest with yourself. If six months in you can’t generate enough to breathe, there’s no shame in getting a job while you build.

Again, cashflow buys you the one thing every founder needs: time to think clearly.

So cash in and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.20 Minutes

Some of the most successful people you’ve heard of barely worked once they made it.

Warren Buffett spends most of his day reading in an office in Omaha. Naval Ravikant built his wealth on a handful of decisions, not hundred-hour weeks.

So plenty of fund managers move more money before lunch than most people earn in a decade, and then go home.

These aren’t lazy people.

They built leverage, and leverage delivers value while you sleep. Code, capital, content, ownership, things that work without you in the room.

But here’s the part people skip: nearly all of them grinded brutally first. The ease came after the leverage, not instead of it.

That’s the whole lesson.

There are seasons to grind and seasons to coast, and mixing them up wrecks you.

Don’t compare your spring to someone else’s summer.

But how do you get there?

Stop trading hours. Build things that compound. Then read which season you’re actually in, and act like it.

So leverage as you can and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 2.50 Minutes

Germans get a bad reputation for being blunt. People say it’s backwards.

But directness isn’t rudeness. Used right, it’s respect.

It’s saying “I value your time enough not to make you decode me.”

Paul Graham nailed it:

If you want something from someone, make it clear what. It’s not imposing to ask explicitly. It’s imposing to be vague and make the recipient do the work of figuring out what you actually mean.

That’s the whole thing. Softening, hinting, dancing around the point, that’s the true selfish move.

You’re outsourcing your discomfort onto others.

Direct people aren’t cold. They’re honest, efficient, and easy to trust.

(but of course stay constructive at all times doing this)

So say what you mean. It’s the kindest thing you can do.

So be direct and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.40 Minutes

Here’s the trap everyone’s falling into right now…

AI shows up with a price that makes the old way look insane. A button instead of a person. Pennies instead of a salary. The math screams yes.

Then you actually use it.

The thing that demoed like magic now needs setup, supervision, and constant cleanup.

It works halfway, but breaks differently each time, and needs someone who actually knows what they’re doing to fix it. The sticker price was never the real cost.

Look around, it’s everywhere.

Vibe coding that ships you a broken half-product from a prompt. AI support that’s cheaper per ticket but quietly bleeds customers. Automation that costs less per task but more in oversight and trust.

I’m not anti-AI.

Sometimes it genuinely wins. But cheaper on paper and better in practice are two completely different things, and people keep confusing them.

So count in everything, like setup, maintenance, and what actually gets delivered.

Often the “expensive” human is the bargain against the chaos current AI can bring. (I know this can change in the future)

But cheaper isn’t value. Working is.

So see the hidden cost of AI and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.10 Minutes

You can’t outwork the world. Someone, somewhere, is just as hungry, probably even hungrier.

Putting in 1,001 hours against someone’s 1,000 doesn’t tip anything. You’re overrating your effort and underrating theirs.

Worse is management celebrating people who are always around as having “work ethic.”

That’s not ethic, that’s someone overworked and mistaking presence for value.

Real work ethic is simpler: do what you said, respect the work, don’t waste people’s time, don’t be the bottleneck. Be someone others can count on.

People actually get ahead through talent, timing, selling ideas, reading people, knowing which details matter. Not hours logged.

Drop the outwork myth. It won’t get you ahead, and it definitely won’t get you calm.

So find your pace and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.20 Minutes

The best entrepreneurial bets are asymmetric: you risk almost nothing, for a few weeks, small money, mild embarrassment, but the upside is uncapped.

That’s a good lottery ticket. Tiny downside, huge potential, and fast signal on whether it works.

Most founders you admire didn’t strike gold first try. They cycled through dozens of ideas before one compounded.

The genius wasn’t the idea, it was the volume. Each ticket taught them what customers actually pay for versus what merely sounds clever in a notebook.

The mistake is treating every idea like a marriage. It’s not. It’s a ticket. Buy it cheap, test it fast, read the signal honestly. No real traction in ninety days?

No sunk-cost guilt, move on to the next one.

Collect tickets relentlessly. Ship faster than feels comfortable. The winner is rarely idea one, it’s usually seven, eight, or even twelve.

So get more shots on goal and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

In general there are two types of people in work life…

Explorers and executers. To get something done, you need both.

But can you be both or is focus needed. Lets find out.

First things first.

Explorers experiment, fail fast, question assumptions, chase new.

Executors standardize, automate, leverage what works, fail never.

They work on the same company, but in a completely different operating system. So what is better or when you need what?

So before product-market fit you need pure exploration. What problem are we solving? Who actually buys? What makes them want it?

This is defently the wrong time to optimize, but the right time to question everything.

Execution here, would kill every company by scaling broken assumptions.

After fit, exploration becomes expensive chaos. Now you standardize, automate, extract value from what’s proven.

Wrong time to reinvent, but right time to compound.

So there are some people can genuinely do both, but of course not simultaneously. Their skill isn’t being both explorer and executor, it’s knowing exactly when to switch.

So stop experimenting when something works. And stop scaling when the market shifts. That timing separates good entrepreneurs from great ones.

But in the end most people can’t switch cleanly. They’re wired for one mode and that’s not a weakness. Forcing an executor to explore produces paralysis. Forcing an explorer to standardize produces ends often in chaos.

So the solution isn’t fighting your nature. It’s finding your complement. The best founding teams are one explorer, one executor, and operating in the right mode at the right moment.

So find the timing to switch and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 2.50 Minutes

This is maybe a unobvoius truth, but most blank canvas businesses fail quietly more often then you think.

Infinite possibility sounds liberating for the start, but they are a trap.

If you looking for a new business idea, you realize no borders are most of the time pushing you away finding a great solution for a real problem.

Greenfields are seductive. No legacy, no limitations, pure vision.

But it’s also where most startups evaporate, building solutions searching for problems. (the worst way you can choose to execute an idea)

There is one better move…

Find the trenches. Regulated industries, legacy software, frustrated workflows, underserved niches.

Places where constraints create friction. Because friction creates willingness to pay.

Constraints tell you exactly what matters.

Budget limits reveal true priorities. Compliance requirements expose where risk lives. Legacy systems show where pain concentrates.

If you can generate real value inside those constraints, navigating the complexity others avoid, you’ve found something defensible.

Because the constraints that slow competitors down become your moat.

Opportunity hides where it’s uncomfortable. Go there.

So find the constrains first and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.20 Minutes

At its core, capitalism is just elegant…

Create more value than you consume, such that both parties leave the transaction better off.

That’s it. That’s the whole game.

Zero-sum thinking says one winner requires one loser. Like poker.

Negotiating a used car. Fixed pie, redistributed slices. Most people mistake business for this.

Positive-sum games create new value entirely. You pay twenty dollars for a book that generates a hundred thousand in knowledge.

Like the author earns, but you even earn more.

The pie gets bigger.

Great businesses are positive-sum machines. Every transaction should leave customers richer, in time, money, capability, or peace of mind, than before they met you.

So the recipe is simple…

Obsessively understand what your customer actually values, then deliver more of it than you charge for.

Price below the value you create. Then repeat at scale.

That it.

(I know this sounds so easy, but is hard to achieve)

But then customers win visibly, they return to you, they refer you, and they trust you also with new stuff.

That compounding loyalty is what capitalism actually rewards when played out correctly. And is often the why longterm thinkers are get great rewards over time.

So look out for the win-win and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Why Results Matter More Than Ever

AI democratized capability, not success.

Everyone has the same tools now, the gap is between people who just generate and people who ship solutions to actual problems.

Building valuable stuff that solves real problems remains the only game. Even more now.

AI just accelerates execution. The winners aren’t prompt engineers; they’re builders using AI relentlessly to create things the market actually pays for.

Real economic value distills to four outcomes:

1. saving time

2. saving money

3. making more money

4. reducing risk

Every business that survives, touches at least one. If your AI project doesn’t map to these, you’re experimenting, not building.

The leverage isn’t in better outputs, it’s in faster problem-solving.

Use AI to cut procurement waste, automate functioning customer support, launch products customers want…

But don’t outsource the thinking of how to build real value for your customers and users.

The economy rewards people who solve problems, not people who talk beautifully about solving them.

AI is the tool. Results are still the scoreboard.

So build on value and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.10 Minutes

Hiring is maybe the most controversial topic of all…

And even with the best methods you will hire more often wrong then right. But maybe there is a better way to score at least not too bad.

So most interviews test credentials and culture fit. But smart companies test idea density instead.

When a candidate drops insights you immediately want to implement, you’ve found maybe THE signal cutting through the résumé noise.

So the feeling you looking for to have yourself after you interviewed a canidate is…

“I want to implement half their ideas even if we don’t hire them”.

This isn’t just a feeling, it’s your company recognizing natural alignment.

They’re already solving your problems without access to internal systems. Imagine what they’d do with actual context.

This flips the a hiring script. Stop asking hypotheticals about workplace conflicts.

Start asking: “What would you change about our product?”

The ones who’ve already thought about it, who have frameworks ready, who make you reach for your notes, those are your people.

Bad hires have good answers to your questions. Great hires have better questions than you knew to ask.

They’re not performing competence; they’re leaking expertise they can’t help but share.

So hire the idea leakers and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 1.10 Minutes

Today a short one for you…

Growth is inevitable for business, so getting great advice from the best of the best which did it before is pure gold.

One who invested in that topic a lot of great work is Elad Gil. And now the best thing you can read his Handbook about High Growth for free here:

High Growth Handbook by Elad Gil

So read on and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Remember when you first joined any social media app and found five of your friends in the first few minutes?

That wasn’t an accident. That was your aha moment. The exact point where you went from “trying this out” to “I need this.”

Everything before that moment is friction. Everything after is retention.

Most products never get users there. They bury value behind tutorials, feature tours, and empty states. Users leave before experiencing why your product matters.

The distance between signup and aha moment predicts churn better than almost anything else.

Slack knew this, their aha moment was 2,000 messages sent by a team. They optimized everything to get teams there fast.

Find your aha moment by looking at users who stick around. What did they do in the first session that churned users didn’t?

That’s the signal to follow.

Then remove everything between signup and that moment.

No tours. No “complete your profile.” Get them to value immediately.

Users don’t churn because your product is bad. They churn because they never experienced it being good.

So get to aha fast and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.10 Minutes

You know churn is killing you. Now what?

Start by segmenting who’s leaving.

Not all churn is equal. Are you losing customers in month one or month twelve?

But why this is such a gig difference…

Early churn means your onboarding sucks or you’re selling to the wrong people. Late churn means your product stopped delivering value or competitors caught up.

Talk to the people who left. Best in an actual conversations. Ask what they expected versus what they got.

Most founders skip this because it’s uncomfortable. Do it anyway.

Then look at your best customers, the ones who stay and expand. What do they have in common?

That’s your actual ICP, not the one you made up in your pitch deck.

Double down there and stop selling to everyone else.

Fix your onboarding. Most SaaS churn happens because users never reached the “aha moment” where your product clicks.

Measure time-to-value and kill every friction point between signup and that moment.

The answer isn’t in your growth playbook. It’s in the reasons why some people leave and why your best customers stay.

Start there.

So listen to leaving customers and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.20 Minutes

Every asked yourself why everyone is so obsessed about churn metrics? No?

Let me give you an example…

You’re adding new customers every month. Revenue is climbing. You feel like you’re winning.

Then you check retention and realize you’re filling a leaky bucket…

Jason Cohen nailed this with his concept of max ARR, the ceiling your business can’t break through because churn eats everything you add.

Imagine, you’re losing 5% of revenue every month, there’s a mathematical limit to how big you can get. No amount of new sales will ever fixes this.

Here's the brutal math:

You're adding $100k in new ARR monthly but losing 5% to churn.

Your maximum ARR caps at $2M. Ever.

You can't get past it because at $2M, you lose $100k monthly to churn, exactly what you're adding.

The treadmill stops moving forward.

Churn isn’t a retention problem. It’s a product problem, a pricing problem, an onboarding problem, or a customer-fit problem.

Fix churn first. Because until you do, every dollar you spend on growth is just funding your leaky bucket.

So listen to your churn rate and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.10 Minutes

You finally hit product-market fit. Customers love your product. Retention is solid. People are telling their friends.

Youre ready to scale.

You dump money into ads and hire a sales team. You close deals but every one feels custom, unrepeatable, exhausting. What’s wrong?

You have product-market fit but not go-to-market fit.

They’re not the same thing.

Product-market fit is when customers start pulling your product toward them instead of you pushing it onto them. But validation doesn’t automatically become a scalable business.

Many enterprise startups get to PMF but don’t achieve growth and acceleration because there’s a missing link. That link is GTM fit.

But what does this mean?

Knowing exactly who buys, how they buy, what they pay, and most important how to build a repeatable machine around that motion.

Think of Go-to-market fit as a system that prints customers.

So go find that system and stay curious after you hit PMF.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Mark Roberge, HubSpot’s first CRO who scaled them from $0 to $100M, proved something most founders ignore:

You can have a great product and still fail because you picked the wrong go-to-market strategy.

Go-to-market fit means your sales and marketing approach actually matches your product and target customer. Sounds easy but it is hard to master.

Roberge built HubSpot’s entire sales machine around this, hiring the same profile, training the same way, measuring the same metrics, optimizing the same funnel.

Most startups mess this up.

They build enterprise software and try to sell it with self-serve PLG.

Or they build a $50/month tool and hire expensive enterprise sales reps.

The product might be perfect. But the GTM kills them...

So define your ideal customer profile ruthlessly. Then build a repeatable sales process around it. then hire and scale the people/process who fit that exact motion.

Don’t hire a sales team and hope they figure it out on their own…

They need a well oiled machine which is already running.

So build the machine, find your working channel and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.40 Minutes

Most startups don’t have a growth engine. They have a collection of tactics that work once and die.

A growth engine is different.

It’s a self-sustaining loop that compounds input and creates output. Then output funds more input, repeat forever.

Without this approach, you’re stuck doing manual outbound, chasing one-time viral hits, and hitting ceilings fast.

There are four main engines:

• SEO (create content → users find it → revenue funds more content)

• Paid Acquisition (spend on ads → acquire users → revenue funds more ads)

• Sales-Led (hire salespeople → close deals → revenue funds more salespeople)

• Product-Led/Viral (users get value → they invite others → more users create more value)

Pick one. Build it properly.

Most founders layer on “turbo boosts” like viral campaigns, PR hits, partnerships and think that’s growth.

But it’s not. Those are temporary spikes.

The engine is what creates compounding S-curves. Everything else just helps it run faster.

If you’re grinding manually every month to hit numbers, you don’t have an engine yet.

You have a treadmill disguised as a strategy.

So build the loop, optimize it and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.

Time: 3.30 Minutes

Product-market fit isn’t forever.

You can have it, then lose it. You have to cherish it, maintain it and always watch it.

This isn’t debated, it’s consensus among all growth experts.

When PMF slips, everything breaks.

Your retention curves flatten. Organic growth stalls. Acquisition costs spike because you’re forcing people into something they don’t love anymore.

The growth engine that used to compound now just burns your cash.

Customer expectations can evolve. What delighted users yesterday becomes table stakes tomorrow.

You chase new markets and dilute your core value proposition. Competition catches up. You stop listening to the users who actually love your product and start building for everyone else.

So treat PMF like fitness…

You lose it without consistent effort. Therefore, taking score of your PMF and tracking retention cohorts, is key.

Focus ruthlessly on your core users, the ones with high expectations who actually care. No-one else.

PMF isn’t a milestone. It’s a system you have to maintain or your business will die.

So start watching your PMF score and stay curious.

Your favourite Domi.

PS I would love if you can give me a follow at X here.

Feedback please! Help your favourite Domi to make all of this even better…

Click on a link to vote or use the comment section below:

👍 Yes Domi, great stuff.

👎 No Domi, wasted my time.